![]() On Novemand before decision the patent expired. Defendant's answer was filed on Decembut the note of issue for trial was not filed until June 19, 1957. The disp ute by correspondence continued through 19 when suit was finally commenced on September 8, 1955. 5 On Jplaintiff's attorney wrote concerning "resume infringement" which evoked a reply disclaiming infringement of "any valid claim of the Clark patent" and asserting t hat the clai ms were inval id. ![]() Correspondence between the attorneys for the parties con tinued at in frequent in tervals thro ugh 1950. 4 Seven years later, on November 12, 1948, an attorney for plaintiff wrote defendant that an advertisement indicated that defendant was offering for sale a desk which infringed its patent. The patent was i ssued on N ovember 18, 1941. Patent to p laintiff, fil ed his appli cation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |